Thursday, February 5, 2009

Aristophanes' Clouds

Aristophanes’ Clouds is a critique of the educational ideologies of his time.  He employs the exaggerated character of Socrates to show all that is wrong with the educational process and the philosophers who strove to interpret the world through their logic.

 

As an audience, we are first introduced to the character of Strepsiades and the troubles he is having with debtors.  Strepsiades, not knowing where else to turn, decides that the best action to beat his debtors’ claims is through learning the art of argument from a the “thinkery” school, taught by Socrates.  This fact is key to revealing the common perception of philosophers at the time, showing them to be thought as people who could escape the responsibilities of life and the consequences of their actions through the use of less than honest arguments and sly, deceptive reasoning.

 

Several things happen with the plot of Clouds, but the important points are clearly made when Strepsiades visits the school.  Instead of finding great discussions in progress about meaningful actualities, he instead finds all too serious philosophers concerning themselves with trivial things, such as which end of the body a gnat makes sounds with, and practicing absurd techniques such as studying the starts with their behinds.

 

Aristophanes’ then makes a point of ridiculing the great philosopher Socrates, suggesting that he, and possibly all the philosophers of the time, have their heads firmly stuck in the clouds, nearly completely detached from reality and the practical aspects of life.  Though Strepsiades turns to Socrates for help, Socrates instead decides to spite Strepsiades by turning him down and instead accepting his son, Pheidippides, but only in order to teach him the wrong and unjust ways of argument.  Philosophers of this time were thought highly of, and this examples serves as a warning, telling that these seemingly “great” thinkers are themselves flawed and can be easily influenced by unjust ideals and actions.

1 comment:

  1. I believe you make a good point in contrasting the educational systems of the traditional Greeks and Socrates. That is basically what the whole story is about and you were spot on to say it was "absurd." The satire presented in this piece was meant to show how ineffective and ridiculous Socrates was and you brought that out in your paper. Another aspect I liked was you mentioning the actual teaching that happens within the school. Very forceful evidence for your point, I must say. The trivial over the pertinent is a big issue in this play and you made sure to emphasize that, good job! Over all, well written and presented and I'm sure you'll get a good grade. :)

    ReplyDelete